Good morning, tradersā¦
I spent a few minutes this morning browsing trading message boards on Reddit, StockTwits, and X.
And although I probably shouldnāt be, Iām shocked by the sheer amount of misinformation out thereā¦
Scrolling through these forums, itās clear that many retail traders are basing decisions on questionable chart comparisons, shaky catalysts, and outright falsehoods.
Whatās worse, they trust the advice of nameless, faceless posters with no proven track record ā only to end up on the wrong side of a trade (or the entire market).
I know itās tempting to chase the latest meme stock or copy someone elseās setupā¦
But those threads donāt cover risk management. They donāt teach you how to scale out or when to cut losses.
They hype a move, then disappear when it failsā¦
Itās a pattern Iāve seen play out far too often. I want you to steer clear of this dangerous trap.
Let Me Show You How To Avoid The Problems With Online Trading Forumsā¦
Random Chart Comparisons Are Almost Always Wrong
One of the favorite pastimes amongst self-ascribed Reddit trading gurus is comparing current charts to those from 2000 and 2008.
Spend a few minutes on trading forums and youāll see posts like thisā¦

Or thisā¦

Or thisā¦

Everyone wants to be like Michael Burry ā predicting the next āBig Shortā before it happens ā without doing any valuable due diligence or research.
But in reality, market crashes are extremely rare events.
Timely and accurate predictions of these events are even rarer.
Yet still, these posts are littered with people commenting about how theyāre following the random poster into some ridiculous short position.
This is a prime example of four well-documented psychological biases:
Recency Bias
This is the tendency to give disproportionate weight to recent events when evaluating the future. Traders are comparing charts from 2000 and 2008 to today, believing that history will repeat itself in the same manner without considering differing circumstances.
Confirmation Bias
Traders might be seeking out historical patterns (like the charts from 2000 or 2008) that align with their pre-existing belief that a major market crash is imminent, ignoring evidence that contradicts their narrative.
Herd Mentality
The willingness of commenters to follow random guys into positions demonstrates the herd mentality. People tend to mimic the actions of a larger group, especially when uncertain, without verifying the quality of the information (or its source).
False Pattern Recognition
Many traders fall prey to the illusion of pattern recognition, believing they see meaningful and predictive patterns in random or unrelated data (e.g., comparing current charts to 2000/2008 charts).
If you look at charts for long enough, you can find patterns everywhere, in every chart, all of the timeā¦
But that doesnāt mean the trajectory of the chart will continue exactly as the other did.
Take everything you read on social media with a large grain of salt.
Think for yourself.
Even if you see a comment or perspective that intrigues you, NEVER put your money into a position without doing your homework first.
No, the Market Isnāt āManipulatedā Against You
I always see comments talking about āmarket manipulationā¦ā
Traders complain that an asset is worth less than what they paid and blame it on some shadowy forces working against them:



But when traders cry about āmanipulation,ā what they really mean is:
āThe stock did anything other than exactly what wouldāve made me the most money. Therefore, the market must be manipulated against me!ā
This is a fallacy.
If a small number of orders is setting cheaper bids to mess with the market, that could be manipulation. (This is rare and unlikely, especially on blue-chip stocks.)
But if millions of orders are setting lower bids and asks, it’s not manipulation ā it just means the asset is losing value because fewer people want it at current levels.
Itās somewhat ironic how many of the traders calling for historic market crashes are the same folks complaining about the minor downside on some individual stock theyāre holding calls on.
Itās as if theyāre thinking, āThe entire market deserves to plummet, but this one stock Iām holding should be up way more!ā
Furthermore, if youāre trading less than, say, $10 million, you are not coming across the radar of any legitimate market maker or institution. I promise.
The Smart Money whales (who can move asset prices with a few keystrokes) are trading in such large volumes that it would be impossible for them to individually pinpoint your 30 contracts for manipulation.
That said, the psychology behind the āmarket manipulation mythā is a classic human trait ā looking for anyone but yourself to blame for your errors.
But remember: personal accountability is a crucial part of being a successful trader.
Unlike most jobs, you donāt have a boss or manager giving you performance reviews, or any other employees to share blame with.
You must own your wins and losses. By doing so, you can maximize the steps that led to the wins and minimize those that led to losses.
The hypnotic pull towards taking random posts as gospel is a prime example of evaluating signal vs. noise in the stock market.
The stuff on the message boards is nothing more than noise. It can be entertaining to look at, but it should never be mistaken for a reliable signal (like technical analysis, positive news catalysts, fundamental earnings growth, or analyst upgrades).
Stop worrying about what invisible traders are saying and doing. Most of them are wrong.
And start tuning out the message boards, thinking for yourself, and doing your own research.
Happy trading,
Ben Sturgill
P.S. Since launching my OMEN Scanner, Iāve achieved an 89% win rate with a 72% average gainā¦*
My top 120 trades have all generated 100% or higher. 27 soared above 200%, and 12 exploded beyond 300%…*
But my biggest trade yet could be setting up RIGHT NOW.
Join Danny Phee TODAY at 9:00 a.m. EST for a LIVE WORKSHOP where heāll go over our best trade ideas in the options market.
This is your last chance ā Click here to sign up before itās too late.
*Past performance does not indicate future results